26 May 2020

 

Why The Proposed Arbitration On States’ Borders Should be Rejected

"...even if the arbitration tribunal does it job, where are the parties going to cultivate the political will to implement the arbitral award that is now lacking to reach an agreement on the outstanding issues."

By Gideon Mabor

The Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of Conflict in South Sudan signed on 12 September 2018 is a political settlement negotiated by warring parties and South Sudanese stakeholders on behalf of the wider South Sudanese population. The agreement aimed to stop the political violence, and ensure a return to peaceful coexistence while committed as a unity government during the transitional period to implement package of post-conflict and democratic reconstruction programmes of state.

Accordingly, these tasks to achieve the vision of a united, peaceful and prosperous South Sudan based on justice, equality, respect for human rights and the rule of law as enshrined under the Transitional Constitution of the Republic of South Sudan as amended includes but not limited to: security arrangements, governance issues, institutional reforms, transitional justice, reintegration and resettlement of refugees and internally displaced persons and finally conduct a free and fair general elections to elect the government.

On the other hand, the agreement provides a resolution mechanism for each thematic issue of the agreement in the event of disagreement or dispute during the course of the implementation. Some of these resolution mechanisms are primary function of the Transitional Government of National Unity while others are delegated to other independent bodies whose decision shall be binding and final.

On the outstanding issue of states and internal boundaries, article 1.15 read together with Annex E of the revitalized agreement clearly provided mechanism for resolution of this particular outstanding issue. Article 1.15.14 provide that “in the unlikely event of the Independent Boundaries Commission (IBC) failing to make its report before the end of its term, the IBC shall be automatically transformed on the 90th day of its term into Referendum Commission on Number and Boundaries of States of the Republic of South Sudan.

Therefore, what is the call for arbitration to resolve the outstanding issue of states and internal boundaries contrary to the letter and spirit of the revitalized agreement ? This departure from modality of dispute resolution and act outside the revitalized agreement is not only harmful to peace in South Sudan, but it is a Pandora box for renegotiation of the agreement and therefore a violations of the reviatalised agreement.

The arbitration proposal from regional envoys led by South African Deputy President His Excellency David Mabuza, should not be accepted by all parties. As leaders who fought for a just cause to achieve the vision of South Sudan as outlined above and in the Constitution, you must swallow your pride and adhere to the letter and spirit of the peace agreement and find amicable solutions.

Finally, even if the arbitration tribunal does it job, where are the parties going to cultivate the political will to implement the arbitral award that is now lacking to reach an agreement on the outstanding issues.

 

Posted in: Home, Opinions
Comments
RSS comment feed
19/01/2020, 11:46 AM
 - Posted by Jacob Akol
Jacob Jiel Akol My proposal is to ditch all the states to Zero and govern from Juba while discussing revival of states as part of the charting of permanent constitution. The only people who will lose out of this proposal are the governors and their henchmen and women, some who are breathing fire on social media, who are getting the perks, not even the civil servants they can't afford to pay salaries to regularly, leave alone the general citizenry who are getting little to zero services from governments of their so-called states.
Edit or delete this
Like
· Reply · 24m · Edited
Awak Kondok
Awak Kondok Jacob Jiel Akol Those who write abroad better come home to the villages and find out for themselves if the people want these states or not. And the best way to find out may actually be a referendum. Why is the issue of states a stumbling block? This is the main issue.
Delete or hide this
Like
· Reply · 5m
Ngor Arol GarangActive Now
Ngor Arol Garang Don't know why i am seeing a sense in what you propose, Jacob Jiel Akol. This could be another solution if there is no middle ground. I have always held more states, even that of the IO are problematic. The best way, return to 10 states, form the government, facilitate return of displaced and repatriate refugees, conduct census, carry out elections and the elected government conduct referendum on number of states and their boundaries. If this is not workable, return to three regions. If not workable as well , give every tribe their own state and let's live in ethnic enclaves devoid of services.
Add Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Featured Videos
THE SOUTH SUDAN NATIONAL DIALOGUE
  • What is The National Dialogue?South Sudan Peace Process
  • Expectations of the National DialogueSouth Sudan Peace Process
  • Gurtong Mobile Cinema
What is The National Dialogue?1 Expectations of the National Dialogue2 Gurtong Mobile Cinema3
 

 

 

Gurtong Radio

Peace Efforts Earn Bishop Paride Taban Top UN Award

 
 English Programs     |      برامج اللغة العربية