Abyei Boundery Demarcation Appeal to H.E.Dr. Riek Machar

Members of the Border Demarcation Commission from South Sudan are in fear of their lives as they are constantly obstructed and threatened by those opposed to the demarcation.

H.E.Dr. Riek Machar Teny

VP. Government of South Sudan (GoSS)
JUBA 

Date: - 09/ 10/ 09

Sub: Abyei Demarcation Field Report

As a matter of an emergency, we the SPLM members in the Abyei Boundary Demarcation Technical committee would like to bring into the attention of the authorities in both the government of southern Sudan (GOSS) and the SPLM leadership.

Indeed, it is our ultimate responsibility and a vital duty to raise any single concern which may appear to be an obstacle obstructing our work, we try to raise these concerns to our leadership in a bid to get back any response or find any solution that can make things moving forward to the right track and make our mission a success, these concerns can be shown in details down bellow:-

1. As we have already mentioned in our preliminary report while  we were still in Khartoum, we still carry on to mention that our partner, the NCP has gain momentum and a conducive ground of success by intentionally omitting the formation of the oversight committee leave alone the international technical assistance, so far the omission of such a committee has given their man who got imposed on top of the technical team as the administrative secretary, his imposture on top of the demarcation team did not take into account the agreed equal numbers from two parties, not that alone but also he has been the authorized person and mandated with unlimited powers to coordinate the administrative and the security sensitive tasks with the presidency and with the SAF forces deployed along the areas adjacent to Abyei boundary line where we started to do the demarcation task, the fact that he has been put alone without any body deputizing him from our side has made him to move freely without any cross checking of the contradicting information he brings to the team from time to another especially at certain occasions when there are some security threats emerging in the area aimed at stopping us from the work.

2. This unfortunate reality has resulted into an enormous frustration and made us to conclude one simple fact, that the formation of our technical committee was completely bias and born while carrying dead seeds, we have valid reasons which made us to arrive at such a conclusion, one of these reasons is that the heavy vehicles that were presumed ready to start working as soon as we arrived Heglig were not there at the time of our arrival to Heglig on 17/ 09/2009, it took us time of many days to get these vehicles organized on the 25th of September 09.

3. Though this very man was telling us that the Bulldozers given to us according to the expertees, will not be in a position to clear a route of more than 4km a day, but we intended to ignore his bias advice, instead we started clearing a route of 11km a day, and we continued the next day our clearance to the route leading to the border corner point number (3).the north eastern corner.

4.  This was the thing that made them hysterical when realizing that the team was determined to clear the border line in a quicker phase, they started putting obstacles so that on the third day and at the evening time of 27/ 09/ 09 the day in which we were going back from Abyei to Heglig after we finished aerial reconnaissance using the UNMIS Helicopter, security tensions were made imminent by SAF,s against the JIU,s forces in the area so that they were chased away from  the area by the same SAF,s  of the division 56 based in Heglig, the JIU’s were threaten using heavy military machine guns leaving us in the area vulnerable and without any protection, it was made obvious that the demarcation team has to stop doing their job due to security reasons, not that alone but also the normal residents nearby to our camping area started to pose security threats on the team if we continue to be within the parameters of their  localities.

5. As this is the situation, we strongly believe that, the so called administrative secretary( Mr. Sami Bushara) is always behind any security move aimed at failing the team to do any demarcation work, indeed, we have every reason to believe so, this is based on his previous records when he kept our proposed budget for the demarcation work on hold while he was contrarily telling the team that our budget has already been approved by the presidency, but to find  later on that the presidency did not receive that budget, instead it was a chock to all of us to be summoned by the presidency to submit in our budget for final discussion in a rough meeting chaired by the state minister in the presidential palace Mr. Idriss Mohammed Abdelgadir and attended by the SPLM state minister Mr. Joseph Lual Achuil on the 27th of August 09, the very budget we have prematurely discussed and expected to have been presented to the presidency a week before that date.

6. Another point of our major concern is the way  the JIU  forces are formed, the JIU,s complement from SAF component are selected from the sons of the Massyeria tribe who are extremely committed to taking sides in the whole boundary conflict, they are not those well trained and do not have the military discipline and conduct, instead of providing the security to the team members, they are the one now coordinating with the Massyeria Mujahedeen and their associated militiamen in their plans to harm the team members as they selectively choose to direct security threats to us we the SPLM team members in the overall technical committee, and this sends unmistakably message that in the worst case scenario where it is expected to face any military confrontation, we expect them to side with the attacking forces rather than protecting the team members, we therefore look forward to get this point considered and the JIU,s get to be changed from other areas apart from the JIU,s based in Abyei area.

7. Why we still doubt the presidency of the republic to have not intended to get this boundary demarcated on the ground is simply based on the simple fact that, they refused to provide the team with digging machineries (Scarvators or cement, and aggregate mixture) instead they have ordered the team to do everything manually in a situation when it is extremely difficult in such a harsh dense terrain with big trees, full of water ponds, muddy wet ground and with long thick grass.

8. Our conclusion is that the team with its current formation will not make it to demarcate the current Abyei boundary as long as the oversight committee was not formed, an oversight team that was suppose to deal with the issues facing us now in our work, we believe that all what we are doing is only time consumption to justify for the NCP in the view of the international community in particular and the entire Sudanese masses in general that the NCP leadership has accepted the arbitration ruling on Abyei boundary and consequently formed a technical committee accordingly, so that if not demarcated, the NCP will justify that it was the technical team that has failed  to demarcate the boundary in a given time frame.

9. Finally, it is absolutely regrettable that, we the SPLM team members remain pocket less not accessing any communication facilities to be in contact with our leadership, we remain vulnerable and in some cases, we get ourselves being forced to beg NCP team members to help us with phone credit cards, indeed it is unfortunate reality that we have no way to avoid if we want to be in contact with our families  and some of our leaders in the government of southern Sudan, we hope some  positive responses to this report.

 

Many Thanks.


1. Mr. Kwol Biong Kwol, Team leader
2. Eng. Valentino Malueth Akec, Member.
3. Eng. Ring Kuol Arop Koor, Member


CC:
- Dr. Luka Biong Deng
Minister of Presidential Affairs.

Comments
RSS comment feed
15/10/2009, 10:40 AM
 - Posted by Reech Deng
The Abyei boundary commission has raised genuine issues which need to be look into by the Government of South Sudan. The threat against their work implies that the South is threatened. Therefore let us be watchful to compel the NCP into full implementation of the Abyei protocol in particular and the CPA in general.
19/10/2009, 7:38 AM
 - Posted by Anonymous User
I do always stand when I heard the issue of Dinka Jok of Abyei County. I don't like the way in which Khartoum Government is mistreated the people of Abyei, but, however, the problem of Dinka Jok of Abyei is hovering and causing some problems to the other Southern Sudanese Community such as Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom County. Last month of July 22,2009, Dinka Jok of Abyei receives their compensation through a genuine dialogue from a Hague Ruling Court. As the problem of Abyei was solved, the problem of Abyei was become a problem to Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom County in Unity State whereby a portion of Dinka Ruweng Land so call Heglig(Aliiny)of Biemnom County was coiled as a part of Dinka Jok territory. Why do we as Southern Sudanese people tried to still our own property instead of Arabs people to do that so since we know that they are our enemies? This is an absurd suggestion and a shame to the three leaders of Dinka Jok of Abyei County such as Deng Alor, Edward Lino Wuor and Luka Biong Deng. The demarcation border of Abyei with Arabs is already over and what left now is the demarcation border of Dinka Jok of Abyei County and Dinka Ruweng of Biemnom County. What I know myself is that the demarcation of Abyei will not be accomplished by the people of Dinka Jok of Abyei without Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom and the Southern Sudan Government..

As a concern, I can not blaming the whole Dinka Jok people of Abyei County because the annexation of Heglig(Aliiny) to Abyei is a lesson to Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom County. Deng Alor, Edward Lino Wuor and Luka Biong Deng did this intentionally as they thought that the indigenous people of Dinka Ruweng who have their land Heglig(Aliiny) and they were been away for about 22 years from their land RUWENG will not come back to Ruweng Land. That is why Deng Alor, Luka Biong Deng and Edward Lino Wuor tried to campaign in order to impound the land of Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom to be their territory. Deng Alor and his two associates leaders of Dinka Jok of Abyei tried very hard to confiscated Heglig(Aliiny), but in fact, both of them failed to achieve victory.

Since I'm from Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom County in Unity State, I do feel confused when the top three leaders of Dinka Jok of Abyei tried to impede the right of Dinka Ruweng People of Biemnom County. Why I said that? Deng Alor, as a Foreign Minister Affairs, should not supposed to said that "we have lost a very great area, but still a grab". This is not supposed to be said in the eyes of our enemies by a big politician like Deng Alor. I thought that Deng Alor is a young politician, but in fact, Deng Alor is not a qualified politician who can stand with external matters of his people whom he deserve to rule. What if Abyei as a county of Dinka Jok was given to Arabs of Northern Sudan, will Deng Alor said that we have lost a very great area, but still a grab? I believe that Deng Alor can not said that at all, but since Heglig (Aliiny) is not belong to Abyei, Deng Alor can attempt to said anything he wants to make Heglig to be a territory of Abyei. There is a prove since Deng Alor, Edward Lino Wuor and Luka Biong Deng said that Heglig(Aliiny) is not a territory of Abyei, but a territory of Unity State. Now they confessed their inner secret.. What matter to me is not oil in Heglig(Aliiny), but the land where I was born. Amongst those of Dinka Jok of Abyei and Dinka Panaruu people who claimed that Heglig(Aliiny) is their territory, what does the word Heglig mean to them by the way? If I asked one of Dinka Jok of Abyei and one of Dinka Panaruu about the meaning of Heglig, no one of them will exactly tell me the meaning of Heglig. All Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom and I myself who wrote this article we are not happy with the way in which these two Dinka Ethnic Communities are trying to misused and taunted our land Heglig(Aliiny) of Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom County in Unity State.
Finally, when Dinka Jok of Abyei failed to achieve what they wants, Dinka Panaruu Community of Panrieng County attach themselves and claim Heglig(Aliiny) as their area. At the same time, Dinka Panaruu of Panrieng County in Unity State call themselves as Ruweng, but they were not Ruweng. In Unity State, there are two Dinka Communities namely:
-Dinka Ruweng - with it County known as Biemnom
-Dinka Panaruu- with it County known as Panrieng

In this point, I don't see the reason why Dinka Panaruu call them Ruweng. Many people of Dinka Panaruu said that they have border with Dinka Jok of Abyei County, but it is not true. The only Dinka Community which have a border with Dinka Jok of Abyei is Dinka Ruweng of Biemnom County. Dinka Panaruu have border with Dinka Ruweng, Nuer and Shilluk as well as Maban of Kadugli. Dinka Ruweng of Biemnom County on the other hand, have border with Twic of Bhar-el-ghazal such as Amiol, Akuar Lang Juuk, Adiang and Kuac-Madut Ring, Nuer Leek and Nuer-Bul. I'm really awared and what is going on is just a matter of suppressing the right of the other Community. Last Febuary 10, 2008, our three leaders from Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom County were killed in Heglig(Aliiny) of Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom and the report said that they were killed in Abyei which is wrong. That is an example because if the problem happened in Ruweng land of Biemnom and then it is reported to be happened in Abyei, then the Southern Sudan Government will not turn their eyes to the people of Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom and as a result, the people of Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom will encountered some insecurity disasters with which the Southern Sudan Governement will not no at all. I know that there is jealousness and that is why some Communities like Dinka Jok of Abyei and Dinka Panaruu Community of Panrieng County like to collaborated themselves so that the can be known by the Southern Sudan Government as an indigenous people of Heglig(Aliiny) while both of them are not even entiltled. Their aims is to push the indigenous people of Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom County in order to be invisible and assume themselves to be the only two Dinka Communities owning Heglig(Aliiny). The problems of Abyei have killed so many people of Dinka Ruweng of Biemnom County since the beginning of the war of NGOL DE RUWENG and NGOL DE NGOK in 1969. What I see myself is that, if one of the Community in Southern Sudan doesn't have anyone to represent them in Southern Sudan Government, then that community can not be known. Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom County have contributed their life in war. In the Movement of the SPLM/SPLA, Dinka Ruweng Community of Biemnom County compose of FIVE BATALIONS of the SPLM/SPLA namely: TIGER BATALION, GHOL BATALION, WOLF BATALION, PART OFJAMUS BATALION and SHARK BATALION. If we come in term of Dinka Jok of Abyei County, then they have ABUSHIOK BATALION and PART OF JAMUS BATALION. In Dinka Panaruu Community, they have BILPAM BATALION and PART OF JAMUS BATALION. So, why some communities tried to complaint for no reason? I challenged Deng Alor very much and in fact, he is not a Foreign Minister of the whole Southern Sudan, but a Foreign Minister of Dinka Jok of Abyei County. This article is not concern of any one, but to challenged the people of Dinka Jok of Abyei and people of Dinka Panaruu who call themselves as Ruweng instead of calling them Panaruu. In short, right can not be wiped off at all, but misinformation or misrepresentation can be disputed regardless of how big it is.

Add Comment
Log in
to post a comment. If you are not a Gurtong member yet, register here.
Designed and built by Brand X